Evaluation infrastructure
Version criteria, evidence and findings so teams can act on them.
AI data and evaluation practice / Frankfurt
Build trustworthy AI and data systems for regulated and high-trust systems in Frankfurt.
AI evaluation should connect dataset lineage, review criteria and model behaviour to the decisions a regulated workflow is allowed to make. In Frankfurt, this connects directly to auditable delivery paths for regulated and sensitive workloads.
What this practice covers
What AI Data & Evaluation covers
Production AI depends on data workflows and evaluation systems that make quality decisions repeatable, inspectable and useful to engineers.
AI Data & Evaluation priorities in Frankfurt
German organizations frequently combine exacting operational standards, established enterprise systems and European governance requirements with pressure to modernize delivery.
Frankfurt's financial, data-centre and transport roles create infrastructure with strict availability and audit expectations. Engineering improvement must make change safer without obscuring accountability.
Banking, insurance, data infrastructure, aviation and logistics require systems that can prove how they operate and recover.
AI evaluation should connect dataset lineage, review criteria and model behaviour to the decisions a regulated workflow is allowed to make.
- Data evidence
- Auditable delivery paths for regulated and sensitive workloads
- Evaluation boundary
- Resilience and observability across data-intensive services
- Production decision
- Cloud architecture with explicit security and sovereignty boundaries
What that gives your team
- Training data with provenance
- Evaluation that can regress
- Feedback loops that improve
Training data pipelines
Prepare and transform text, image, audio and multimodal data for controlled use.
Annotation workflows
Design labeling, review, calibration and adjudication around quality criteria.
LLM and agent evaluation
Create rubrics, datasets and regression workflows for application behavior.
Human feedback
Capture comparisons, demonstrations and preference signals in structured form.
Data quality
Make disagreement, review outcomes and quality thresholds visible.
How it works
How AI data work moves
The workflow connects quality criteria to the people, data and engineering decisions that use the result.
01
Define
Translate the quality question into criteria, rubric and decision boundaries.
02
Build
Create datasets, annotation paths or evaluation runs with traceable versions.
03
Review
Calibrate reviewers, handle disagreement and inspect quality signals.
Engagement models
Choose how we work together
Engagements can isolate risk in a defined workstream, support an internal platform group or provide accountable delivery around a larger German transformation programme. For AI Data & Evaluation, the initial scope should stay anchored to auditable delivery paths for regulated and sensitive workloads.
ConsultingADVISORY
Opinions, reviews, and focused direction.
ExploreStaff AugmentationEMBEDDED
Ongoing capacity in your engineering team.
On-Call SupportON-CALL
Incidents, rotations, and production response.
OutsourcingDELIVERY
Roadmaps with clear delivery ownership.
SolutionsPROJECT
Plan and deliver a defined technical outcome.
ExploreSupportCARE
Ongoing engineering care and improvement.
Questions answered
AI Data & Evaluation questions, answered
A short set of practical questions to clarify the first conversation.
How should governance and audit needs shape AI Data & Evaluation work in Frankfurt?
AI evaluation should connect dataset lineage, review criteria and model behaviour to the decisions a regulated workflow is allowed to make. Scope should begin with the systems, owners and evidence connected to auditable delivery paths for regulated and sensitive workloads.
Is this model training or data engineering?
The category focuses on the data, feedback and evaluation infrastructure around AI systems; model training is only in scope where it is part of that evidenced workflow.
Can you evaluate an existing LLM or agent?
The existing LLM and Agent Evaluation Systems service supports application-specific criteria, datasets, regression runs and actionable findings.
How do you handle reviewer disagreement?
Calibration, review and adjudication are explicit workflow concerns rather than hidden quality assumptions.
Is AI Data On-Call Support available?
No. The model is drafted for architectural completeness but remains nonpublic and nonroutable.
Next step
Frame the next AI data and evaluation step in Frankfurt.
Start with auditable delivery paths for regulated and sensitive workloads and the technical or organizational boundary that makes it difficult today.